•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Legacy and Other Languages section within the Software Development category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 457,011 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 3,135 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Legacy and Other Languages advertiser: Programming Forums
Views: 836 | Replies: 4
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,752
Reputation:
Rep Power: 19
Solved Threads: 200
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Reputation:
Rep Power: 0
Solved Threads: 0
Thanks for your help(?). I rather thought that it was fairly grown up to wonder why two apparently identical systems behaved differently. Aged 73, with BSc, MSc, PhD and DSc degrees, and with 180 scientific publications in professionally edited and refereed journals to my name, I find that this approach has served my fairly well in the past.
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 1,878
Reputation:
Rep Power: 13
Solved Threads: 194
With Windows, there is no such thing as 'identical systems', alas.
Because of its age GW-BASIC has some difficulties handling the hardware/software changes that have occurred beneath it. XP's DOS emulator is actually rather weak, and is known to goof in weird spots.
A good spot to start when dealing with Windows directly is this page: Running GW-BASIC under Windows. (The whole site is actually pretty good.) The recommendation is to have your GW-BASIC programs set up to start by turning off as much as the new-fangled Windows stuff as possible, and open directly in a full-screen mode. (Of course, Vista will not play fair no matter what you do to the Windows environment.)
There is also a known bug with Compaq systems that needs to be patched. (But I don't know if this applies --it has been years since I have had to mess with a Compaq PC.) Enable Compaq PCs to Run QBASIC Programs
The other option is to run it under a good DOS emulator. (That is, not the one that comes with Windows.) I recommend DOSBox. There are others.
Good luck!
Because of its age GW-BASIC has some difficulties handling the hardware/software changes that have occurred beneath it. XP's DOS emulator is actually rather weak, and is known to goof in weird spots.
A good spot to start when dealing with Windows directly is this page: Running GW-BASIC under Windows. (The whole site is actually pretty good.) The recommendation is to have your GW-BASIC programs set up to start by turning off as much as the new-fangled Windows stuff as possible, and open directly in a full-screen mode. (Of course, Vista will not play fair no matter what you do to the Windows environment.)
There is also a known bug with Compaq systems that needs to be patched. (But I don't know if this applies --it has been years since I have had to mess with a Compaq PC.) Enable Compaq PCs to Run QBASIC Programs
The other option is to run it under a good DOS emulator. (That is, not the one that comes with Windows.) I recommend DOSBox. There are others.
Good luck!
![]() |
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Legacy and Other Languages Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
- GWBASIC and XP Pro (Legacy and Other Languages)
Other Threads in the Legacy and Other Languages Forum
- Previous Thread: How to get "NIGHT" node from LISP list (((GOOD))((NIGHT))) ?
- Next Thread: DrScheme .txt file and strings management HELP.



Linear Mode