Posts
 
Reputation
Joined
Last Seen
0 Reputation Points
67% Quality Score
Upvotes Received
2
Posts with Upvotes
2
Upvoting Members
2
Downvotes Received
1
Posts with Downvotes
1
Downvoting Members
1
1 Commented Post
0 Endorsements
Ranked #22.6K
Ranked #4K
~5K People Reached
Favorite Forums

7 Posted Topics

Member Avatar for Louie_Rave

May be you can atleast start off with something and post your first hurdle here. This way we will be able to help you more precisely.

Member Avatar for markanderson4
1
4K
Member Avatar for priya_pawar

I am sorry but we are not going to spoonfeed you for your assignments. Try out something and then ask speciific questions.

Member Avatar for Ancient Dragon
-1
181
Member Avatar for cih1091

According to me you should go for Linked Lists as suggested by Ancient Dragon. Its a good solution.

Member Avatar for WaltP
0
128
Member Avatar for rhowell
Member Avatar for poornamoksha
0
267
Member Avatar for rithish

Try this #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int i,n,a=0,b=0,sum=0; printf("enter the limit of amstrong number: "); scanf("%d",&n); // CHANGE :: scanf expects an address as second argument for(i=1;i<=n;i++) { sum=0; // CHANGE :: reinitialize sum to zero everytime a=i; while(a>0) { b=a%10; // CHANGE :: Perform operations on …

Member Avatar for Gonbe
0
207
Member Avatar for niyasc

Seems like the problem is due to insufficient size of the array s. Try changing you array size to s[10][12]

Member Avatar for niyasc
0
210
Member Avatar for omkar_hande

I completely agree with deceptikon. For example, in case of Linux you have wait() and waitpid() functions to get the exit status of child process. More on this [here](http://linux.die.net/man/3/wait)

Member Avatar for poornamoksha
0
292

The End.